Tuesday, February 5, 2013

Counter Defendants of Nevada Slapp Case, Free Speech Threat, District of Nevada Case 2:12-cv-02040-GMN-PAL published defamatory statements with ‘actual malice,’ against counter Plaintiff Crystal Cox, yet they have NO LIABILITY and are above the LAW. Counter Defendants of District of Nevada Case 2:12-cv-02040-GMN-PAL and Defendants of Rakofsky V. The Internet Rule the Courts, Dominate the "legal blogsphere", and control the illusion of "Legal Commentary".

Counter Defendants and Alleged Co-Conspirators of District of Nevada Case 2:12-cv-02040-GMN-PAL published defamatory statements with ‘actual malice,’ against counter Plaintiff Crystal Cox, meaning they had knowledge that the statements they were posting were false and they went ahead with reckless disregard of whether they were false or not and posted these defamatory false statement.  Times v. Sullivan, Nov. 30 Op. at 5, 1 ER 39. 

Counter Plaintiff Crystal Cox cannot recover damages without proof that Counter Defendant was negligent and Counter Plaintiff Crystal Cox may not recover presumed damages absent of proof of actual malice as in Gertz, 418 U.S. at 347.” Id. at 9, 1 ER 43.

Clearly in District of Nevada Case 2:12-cv-02040-GMN-PAL Counter Defendants had actual malice, they posted FALSE STATEMENTS knowing the information was false, and therefore cannot hide behind the skirt of Gertz, and Times V. Sullivan as a reason, adefense to have defamed me, Counter Plaintiff Crystal Cox, Deliberately and with Actual Malice. And somehow have no liability what so ever.

There is clear, blatant and OBVIOUS proof that Counter Defendants were seriously, deliberately, negligent, and had blatant, boldly lit, obvious, ACTUAL MALICE.

Why are These Attorneys Above the Law? Why do these NPR Reporters, Forbes Journalists, Fraud File Investigators, New York Times Journalists, and Law Firms get a Free Pass to defame and to violate the laws they are allegedly there to defend, to report on, to investigate? Why do the laws not apply to them? Is it because I am Pro Se? Is it because they own the courts, or have mafia ties and other massive money and power behind them?

Seriously, it is Obvious they Defamed me cruelly, maliciously and yet they have no liability, and on top of that SUE me, and those connected to me and get judgments, rulings, injunctions for whatever they want; with no due process or constitutional rights for me, WHY?

No comments:

Post a Comment