District of Nevada Anti-Slapp; Free Speech; Defamation Case. Crystal Cox, Marc Randazza Legal BATTLE

Free Speech Threat, Chill Speech Threat, First Amendment Rights Violation, Intellectual Property Theft, Violation of Due Process, Fraud on the Courts, Abuse of the Courts, Attorney Bullying, Attorney Privilege, Pro Se Discrimination, Pattern and History. Written Upon the Knowledge and Belief of Investigative Blogger Pro Se Defendant / Pro Se Counter Plaintiff Crystal L. Cox ~ Crystal@CrystalCox.com

Sunday, September 22, 2013

Are Sucks Sites, Gripe Site a Constitutional Right?

Marc Randazza TOOK RandazzaLegalGroupSucks.com with no respect for the First Amendment what So Ever.

Marc Randazza defends those who have "sucks" sites, yet sued a female blogger for having such a site that criticized him, and she did not even get due process, he simply got a court to Give him the domain name just like that.

Check Out the Documents, Motions and Rulings in this Case. Sucks sites are not legal to have, to build content. Google may talk about them, others may have them, but if you speak badly of First Amendment Attorney Marc Randazza, he will take what he wants, paint you out to be the bad guy in big media and ruin your life and there is nothing you can do about it.

Docket to the WORLDS most Hypocritical Free Speech Case, SLAPP Lawsuit
http://ia701205.us.archive.org/2/items/gov.uscourts.nvd.91330/gov.uscourts.nvd.91330.docket.html

No comments:

NV Case 2:12-cv-02040-GMN-PAL

Court Documents and Filings of District of Nevada Case 2:12-cv-02040-GMN-PAL - Chill Speech Case

ORIGINAL Complaint Filed - SLAPP Lawsuit, Chill Free Speech, First Amendment Legal Threat, Free Speech Suppression, Free Speech Legal Threat - State of Nevada Case 2:12-cv-02040-GMN-PAL

Pro Se Defendant / Pro Se Counter Plaintiff Crystal Cox, Counter Claim - Counter Lawsuit

Defendant Crystal Cox Complaint Answer State of Nevada Case 2:12-cv-02040-GMN-PAL

EX PARTE MOTION / Proposed Order for Temporary Restraining Order and MOTION for Preliminary Injunction Filed by Plaintiffs, District of Nevada Case Number 2:12-cv-02040-GMN-PAL, Document Number 2

http://www.docstoc.com/docs/142406400/Ex-Parte-Motion-for-Temporary-Restraining-Order-and-Motion-for-Preliminary-Injunction

Document 2-1 Marc J. Randazza Declaration in support of Ex Parte Motion for Temporary Restraining Order and Motion for Preliminary Injunction
http://www.docstoc.com/docs/142406320/Document-2-1-Marc-J-Randazza-Declaration-in-support-of-Ex-Parte-Motion-for-Temporary-Restraining-Order-and-Motion-for-Preliminary-Injunction

SUPPLEMENT TO EX PARTE MOTION FOR TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER AND MOTION FOR PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION, Document #6.
http://www.docstoc.com/docs/142405386/SUPPLEMENT-TO-EX-PARTE-MOTION

Pro Se Defendant / Pro Se Counter Plaintiff Crystal Cox Response / Objection to to EX PARTE MOTION for Temporary Restraining Order and MOTION for Preliminary Injunction Filed by Plaintiffs, Document 29
http://www.docstoc.com/docs/142332681/Defendant-Crystal-Cox-Objection-to-TRO-Injunctive-Relief

Memorandum To Pro Se Defendant / Pro Se Counter Plaintiff Crystal Cox Response / Objection to to EX PARTE MOTION for Temporary Restraining Order and MOTION for Preliminary Injunction
http://www.docstoc.com/docs/142332992/Memorandum-to-Objection-to-Injunctive-Relief-and-Temporary-TRO-in-Favor-of-Plaintiff

REPLY IN SUPPORT OF PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION FOR TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER AND MOTION PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION, Document 12
http://www.docstoc.com/docs/142405610/REPLY-IN-SUPPORT-OF-PLAINTIFFS%E2%80%99-MOTION-FOR-TEMPORARY-RESTRAINING-ORDER-AND-MOTION-PRELIMINARY-INJUNCTION

ORDER Granting 2 Motion for Temporary Restraining Order. Motion Hearing set for 1/7/2013 03:00 PM in LV Courtroom 7D before Judge Gloria M. Navarro re 2 Motion for Preliminary Injunction. Responses due by 12/28/2012. Replies due by 1/4/2013. Signed by Judge Gloria M. Navarro on 12/14/2012. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - SLR) (Entered: 12/17/2012), Document Entry 14
http://www.docstoc.com/docs/142332117/Exhibit-TRO-A-Letter-From-Ron-Green-Ltr-to-Cox-encl-TRO-Order

REPLY to Response to 2 MOTION for Temporary Restraining Order and MOTION for Preliminary Injunction filed by Plaintiffs / REPLY IN SUPPORT OF PLAINTIFFS' Motion for Preliminary Injunction Against Cox and Bernstein, Document 28
http://www.docstoc.com/docs/142405052/REPLY-IN-SUPPORT-OF-PLAINTIFFS-Motion-for-Preliminary-Injunction-Against-Cox-and-Bernstein

REPLY to Response to MOTION for Temporary Restraining Order and
MOTION for Preliminary Injunction filed by Defendant Crystal L Cox Document 30
http://www.docstoc.com/docs/142333607/Opposition-to-Document-28---Google-Drive

District of Nevada Case Number 2:12-cv-02040-GMN-PAL Court Docket Entry 35

Judge Refuses to Sign Conflict of Interest Disclosure and Admit or Deny Conflict, Judge

DENIES Motion to Sign COI Disclsure.

Judge Denies to Recluse, Remove, Disqualify Herself as Judge in District of Nevada Case Number 2:12-cv-02040-GMN-PAL as Requested in a Motion filed by Pro Se Defendant / Pro Se Counter Plaintiff Crystal Cox.

" MINUTES OF PROCEEDINGS - Motion Hearing held on 1/7/2013 before
Judge Gloria M. Navarro. Crtrm Administrator: Michael Zadina; Pla Counsel:
Ronald Green; Def Counsel: None present; Court Reporter/FTR #: Araceli
Bareng; Time of Hearing: 3:49-4:09 a.m.; Courtroom: 7D;

The Court makes preliminary remarks and hears representations from Mr.
Green regarding the 2 Motion for Preliminary Injunction.

IT IS ORDERED that 19 Motion for Judges and Clerks to Sign a Conflict of Interest Disclosure is DENIED;

20 Motion Requesting the Recusal, Removal of District Judge is DENIED;

31 Motion to Strike Defendant Cox's Reply to Response is DENIED; and

2 Motion for Preliminary Injunction is GRANTED. Mr. Green
shall file a proposed order consistent with the Court's ruling."

Unconstitutional Denial of Due Process. NEVADA Case 2:12-cv-02040-GMN-PAL. Plaintiff Motion to Strike Defendant's Complaint Answer and Counterclaim

Defendant Crystal Cox Motion to Recluse, Remove Disqualify Judge

Request for Judge to Sign a Disclosure Admitting or Denying Conflict.

http://www.docstoc.com/docs/142313093/District-of-Nevada-Case-Number-212-cv-02040-GMN-PA-Conflict-of-Interest-Disclosure-Request-January-12th-2013

First Request by Pro Se Defendant / Pro Say Counter Plaintiff Crystal Cox to Remove Judge

Motion Requesting the Reclusal, Removal of Judge Gloria M. Navarro, First Request, filed by District of Nevada Case Number 2:12-cv-02040-GMN-PAL Pro Se Defendant Crystal L. Cox - Pro Se Counter Plaint

" MINUTES OF PROCEEDINGS - Motion Hearing held on 1/7/2013 before
Judge Gloria M. Navarro. Crtrm Administrator: Michael Zadina; Pla Counsel:
Ronald Green; Def Counsel: None present; Court Reporter/FTR #: Araceli
Bareng; Time of Hearing: 3:49-4:09 a.m.; Courtroom: 7D;

The Court makes preliminary remarks and hears representations from Mr.
Green regarding the 2 Motion for Preliminary Injunction.

IT IS ORDERED that 19 Motion forJudges and Clerks to Sign a Conflict of Interest Disclosure is DENIED;

20 Motion Requesting the Recusal, Removal of District Judge is DENIED;

31 Motion to Strike Defendant Cox's Reply to Response is DENIED; and

2 Motion for Preliminary Injunction is GRANTED. Mr. Green
shall file a proposed order consistent with the Court's ruling."

Motion to Reconsider Request by Pro Se Defendant / Pro Say Counter Plaintiff Crystal Cox to Remove Judge (Second Request)

District of Nevada Case Number 2:12-cv-02040-GMN-PAL MOTION for Recusal of District Judge Gloria Navarro filed by Counter Claimant Crystal L Cox, Counter Plaintiff Crystal L Cox, Defendant Cox

Plaintiff's Response in Opposition to Motion for Reconsideration of Reclusal / Removal of Judge Gloria M. Navarro.

State of Nevada Case 2:12-cv-02040-GMN-PAL. Pro Se Defendant - Pro Se Counter Defendant Crystal Cox Reply to Plaintiff's Response in Opposition to Motion Requesting Reclusal, Removal Disqualification of Judge Gloria Navvaro. Free Speech Threat, Chill Speech Threat, First Amendment Threat, Free Speech Threat Legal Action - Nevada.

Sunday, September 22, 2013

Are Sucks Sites, Gripe Site a Constitutional Right?

No comments:

Post a Comment